 | Chess Game Rules |
Vote and you will uncover!
Funky name, real interests
Funky name, real interests
disasterminatornado
36 ( +1 | -1 )
Perpetual check Ok, so if you can manage to put your opponent in check over and over again, you can declare it a draw, but is it considered "cheap" or "unethical" to do this? It seems some people don't appreciate this, but I think if you can think up of a way to corner the opponent's king, good for you, you planned something and managed to dodge getting a loss despite your material disadvantage.
Any thoughts on this?
More: Chess App
zdrak
13 ( +1 | -1 )
There is not, never was, and never will be, anything unetical about forcing a draw by perpetual check. It's perfectly legitimate.
More: King Chess
criss_cross_it
atrifix
25 ( +1 | -1 )
The only "cheap" or "unethical" tactics emerge off of the chessboard. You should always play your best. If it leads to a draw by perpetual check in an otherwise losing position, then, well, your opponent should have prevented it.
More: Chess Videos
tulkos
3 ( +1 | -1 )
of course it's ethical! It's all part of the strategy of the game.
More: Microsoft Chess
disasterminatornado
28 ( +1 | -1 )
It would be nice if certain players would not first decline the draw and say "IF YOU WERE A GOOD PLAYER YOU WOULD TO RESIGN" but I guess there will always be people like that. That's just being a sore loser.... or, I guess, a sore non-winner.
More: Chess History